Sunday Sermon -- A growing discourse among Christian scholars is challenging the long‑held belief in a literal physical return of Jesus Christ, sparking debate within faith communities across the globe.
While the doctrine of the Second Coming has long been a cornerstone of Christian teaching, a segment of theologians now argue that Jesus will not return in the dramatic, apocalyptic way traditionally envisioned.
For centuries, most Christian denominations have taught that Jesus will one day return visibly to Earth to judge humanity, establish God’s kingdom, and bring ultimate justice.
This belief shapes the faith and practices of millions, influencing worship, sermons, and theological education.
However, some scholars contend that this understanding is a misreading of biblical texts, which they argue are often symbolic rather than literal forecasts of future events.
Experts supporting this interpretation point to the literary genres of the New Testament, including the apocalyptic writings of Revelation and the prophetic sections of the Gospels.
“Ancient authors used highly symbolic language to convey theological truths,” said Dr. Peter Mwangi, a lecturer in theology.
“References to Christ coming again, judgment, and the kingdom often describe ongoing spiritual realities rather than a future physical event.”
These scholars also emphasize the concept of “realized eschatology,” where Jesus’ teachings and actions inaugurated God’s kingdom on Earth during his lifetime, with the Church continuing that work through history.
From this perspective, the Second Coming represents the unfolding of divine justice and spiritual transformation within communities rather than a sudden cosmic intervention.
It reframes Christian hope as an active, present engagement with ethical living, compassion, and justice, consistent with Jesus’ teachings.
Critics of this viewpoint warn that it challenges foundational beliefs held by many Christians.
They argue that denying a literal return could weaken eschatological motivation and disrupt traditional teachings about divine judgment and salvation.
Nevertheless, proponents assert that viewing these passages symbolically does not diminish faith; instead, it invites believers to focus on the lived experience of God’s kingdom today and the ongoing moral and spiritual transformation of individuals and societies.
This debate continues to unfold in seminaries, churches, and online forums, highlighting diverse interpretations of Scripture.
As theologians, scholars, and believers engage with these ideas, the discussion is reshaping how some Christians understand hope, divine action, and the nature of salvation in the modern world.