A fresh controversy has erupted over a proposed Sh180 billion expansion deal at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA), raising questions about transparency, procurement procedures, and government accountability.
According to details highlighted by the Daily Nation, the project—reportedly awarded to a Chinese firm—has triggered sharp criticism from key stakeholders, including the Law Society of Kenya (LSK).
The concerns emerge barely months after the cancellation of a previous high-profile airport deal linked to Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, which had already stirred public debate during the 2024 Gen Z protests.
The LSK has flagged what it describes as a “lack of transparency” in the procurement process, arguing that the new deal appears to have been conducted in secrecy.
Legal experts and civil society actors warn that failure to disclose full details of such a significant infrastructure contract could undermine public trust and expose the country to financial and legal risks.
Sources within state agencies overseeing procurement indicate that the contract was awarded earlier this month.
It is currently within a mandatory 14-day window that allows unsuccessful bidders to challenge the outcome before final approval.
However, critics argue that limited public disclosure makes it difficult for stakeholders to assess the fairness of the process.
Several voices have since weighed in on the matter. Consumer Federation of Kenya (Cofek) has pointed to existing legal disputes tied to earlier agreements, while governance advocates insist that public participation and full disclosure are essential for projects of this scale.
There are also warnings that the deal could violate constitutional provisions if due process is not followed.
The unfolding dispute places the government under renewed scrutiny, particularly at a time when public confidence in large-scale procurement remains fragile