A sharp critique by political analyst Kipkalya Kones has intensified debate within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), following a recent media interview by Siaya Senator Oburu Odinga.
Kones faulted Oburu’s handling of party matters, arguing that his remarks exposed internal divisions instead of promoting unity.
He took issue with what he described as an extended focus on Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, saying the discussion sidelined more pressing issues facing the party.
He contrasted this with the approach of ODM leader Raila Odinga, noting that Raila has often avoided discussing party officials in public.
Kones cited Raila’s past handling of disagreements with former secretary general Ababu Namwamba as an example of efforts to contain internal disputes without escalating them.
Kones also dismissed claims surrounding an incident in Kakamega, where Oburu reportedly linked Sifuna to crowd hostility during a delegates’ meeting.
He maintained that the event, organised by Kakamega Governor Fernandes Barasa, had its own dynamics and that blaming Sifuna for the crowd’s reaction was inaccurate.
The criticism comes at a time when ODM is grappling with internal pressure and shifting political alignments ahead of the 2027 General Election.
Kones said the party is facing growing demands for change, particularly from younger members pushing for a different leadership approach.
He questioned the continued focus on Sifuna, arguing that ODM’s current challenges—including disagreements over zoning and alliances—cannot be placed on one individual.
According to Kones, such focus risks diverting attention from deeper structural issues within the party.
Kones also pointed to the influence of Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga and National Assembly Minority Leader Junet Mohamed, suggesting that internal power dynamics are shifting as the party navigates its next phase.
At the same time, he raised concerns about ODM’s engagement with the government, warning that decisions perceived to align closely with President William Ruto’s administration without wider consultation could deepen discontent within party ranks.
The remarks highlight growing tension within ODM as leaders differ on strategy, alliances, and the party’s future direction. How the party manages these disagreements is likely to shape its position in the country’s evolving political landscape.

