Embakasi East Member of Parliament Babu Owino has strongly opposed reported plans to establish an Ebola quarantine facility in Kenya, warning that such a move must not proceed without full public consultation and national consent.
In a statement, the outspoken legislator said Kenyans should not be subjected to health-related projects that raise anxiety and questions over safety and sovereignty.
He argued that the government’s primary duty is to safeguard citizens rather than introduce initiatives that could deepen mistrust.
“We, the people of Kenya, categorically reject any attempt by the government to establish an Ebola facility in our country without the explicit consent and confidence of the Kenyan people. Our nation must never be treated as a testing ground for projects that raise legitimate concerns about public health, safety, and national sovereignty,” Babu said.
He further urged the State to prioritise strengthening the country’s existing health infrastructure, noting that many Kenyans continue to struggle with access to affordable and quality healthcare amid economic pressure.
“The government’s first responsibility is to protect its citizens, not to make decisions that create fear, uncertainty, and mistrust among the population. At a time when Kenyans are grappling with economic hardships, unemployment, and challenges in accessing quality healthcare, the government’s priority should be strengthening existing health systems and improving the lives of its people,” he added.
The remarks come amid growing public debate over reports of a proposed United States-supported Ebola preparedness arrangement involving a quarantine facility in Kenya, intended for handling suspected cases linked to international exposure.
Health authorities, including the Ministry of Health, have in recent weeks emphasised that Kenya is strengthening surveillance systems, border screening, laboratory capacity, and emergency response mechanisms following Ebola outbreaks in neighbouring countries.
However, the proposal has sparked political and legal scrutiny, with critics raising concerns over transparency, public participation, and the potential implications for national health security.
A court challenge has also been filed seeking to halt or review the arrangement pending further public consultation.