ODM Party Communications Director Philip Etale has rejected claims that the party was “bought” following last week’s consultative meeting between ODM and UDA leaders at State House, saying the allegations amount to political talk meant to distort normal dialogue between parties.
The April 23 meeting brought together leaders from the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) and the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) in what was described as continued consultations on national issues and governance priorities.
The engagement, however, quickly sparked political debate, with critics questioning ODM’s closeness to the government side.
Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was among those who criticised the meeting, alleging that ODM risks being absorbed into the ruling coalition through its engagements with UDA.
His remarks added to growing public discussion on whether the cooperation signals political unity or strategic communication between rival formations.
Etale dismissed the claims, saying there was nothing unusual about political parties engaging each other.
“Some people want to meet people. That’s right. But when others meet people… WAMENUNULIWA. Eti chama kimeuzwa. That’s lazy talk,” he said.
He argued that such accusations reflect what he described as a refusal by some politicians to accept dialogue as part of democratic practice.
According to him, meetings between parties should not automatically be interpreted as political deals or takeovers.
Etale added that ODM and UDA have a legitimate right to engage on matters affecting the country, saying political consultation is part of democratic maturity.
He maintained that participation in such talks does not change ODM’s identity or independence.
ODM leaders have in recent weeks defended their engagement with the government, insisting that dialogue is necessary in addressing national challenges and ensuring stability.
They have also maintained that the party remains distinct in ideology and structure.
The controversy highlights the sensitivity around ODM’s growing interaction with the Kenya Kwanza administration, with opponents warning that it could blur political boundaries ahead of future elections.
For ODM, however, the position remains that engagement does not amount to absorption, but rather reflects a political environment where dialogue between rival camps is both normal and necessary.