Political activist Morara Kebaso has called on Kenyan voters to rethink the practice of supporting candidates solely based on ethnic affiliation, describing it as a costly mistake.
Speaking on social media platform X, Kebaso compared ethnic loyalty in elections to hiring a relative in a business, only to face theft and financial loss that cannot be recovered due to family ties.
Kebaso emphasized that prioritizing tribe over competence can leave citizens worse off, likening it to investing in a business and losing both stock and loans because relatives exploit the relationship.
“In the end, you are the one left poor with a loan to repay,” he wrote, highlighting the personal and societal consequences of such choices.
The activist also used a striking analogy, noting that even when harm comes from within one’s own group, it can be easier to tolerate than losses inflicted by outsiders.
He criticized unquestioning loyalty, referring to it as “foolish” and counterproductive, urging Kenyans to value practical outcomes over traditional allegiances.
Ethnic voting has been a longstanding feature of Kenya’s political landscape, influencing party strategies, election outcomes, and regional power dynamics.
Kebaso’s comments arrive amid growing public debates about electoral reform and the need for merit-based leadership selection.
His statement reflects broader concerns over the impact of tribalism on economic and social development, suggesting that voters’ choices have tangible consequences beyond politics.
By highlighting parallels with business mismanagement, Kebaso aims to frame the discussion in practical terms, encouraging citizens to consider competence, integrity, and accountability in leadership.
Kebaso’s remarks add to an ongoing conversation about Kenya’s political culture, where ethnicity has historically shaped electoral outcomes.