Lawyer Donald Kipkorir Criticises Western Media over Global Conflicts and Sanctions

Photo: Donald B Kipkorir 

Lawyer Donald Kipkorir has ignited debate on social media with a post condemning what he calls Western media’s role in shaping international conflicts and sanctions. 

In a statements on X, Kipkorir argued that Western media “advocated for the invasion” of states such as Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran, and subsequently supported sanctions against Russia, China, Venezuela and Cuba.

Kipkorir’s comments suggest that once military interventions occur, the media “moved on” to identify new targets, leaving affected states to unravel in their aftermath. 

He further stated that Western media reserves its “most visceral hatred” for Russia and Iran, while noting that these nations are “ancient, rich & proud civilizations” with significant natural resources and strategic geopolitical positions.

Critics of Western intervention have previously pointed out that the 2011 NATO‑led operation in Libya, authorised under UN Resolution 1973, contributed to prolonged instability and fragmented governance, a situation shaped by complex foreign involvement and competing local actors. 

Western sanctions against Russia, particularly after the 2014 Crimea annexation and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, have been central to geopolitical tensions, with debate ongoing about their effectiveness and impact on global markets and diplomacy.

Kipkorir’s post taps into broader discussions about international media framing and foreign policy, with analysts underscoring that media coverage can influence public perception and political momentum for intervention. 

Some observers also argue that media narratives differ significantly by region and conflict, affecting global empathy and policy responses.