A fresh political debate has erupted online after social media activist Francis Gaitho questioned the nature of President William Ruto’s relationship with the public, suggesting it has changed significantly since his rise to power.
He claimed that public appearances and expressions of support now seem more organised and structured, compared to the spontaneous crowds and organic online backing Ruto once enjoyed during his early political campaigns.
According to Gaitho, the President previously attracted large followings without heavy financial involvement.
He contrasted that period with what he described as today’s carefully planned rallies, coordinated endorsements, and organised online messaging.
The post quickly gained traction, drawing thousands of reactions and comments from Kenyans across the political divide.
Gaitho also linked this shift to rising government spending, particularly at State House.
He suggested that increased expenditure could be tied to maintaining visibility and political support, though he did not provide specific figures.
His remarks have added momentum to ongoing public conversations about accountability and the cost of governance.
The post avoided naming individuals or groups but raised broader questions about political mobilisation in modern Kenya.
Supporters of the government dismissed Gaitho’s claims as speculative, arguing that structured political communication is normal for any administration in office.
Others said the concerns reflect growing unease over how public resources are used.